List of (Suspected) Errata and Formatting Issues
How to contribute
This page is maintained collectively and you are invited to contribute as well!
Please respect entries made by other contributes and do neither change nor remove them!
Here are two ways to contribute to this page:
The Fast Way (When you have at least little experience with programming or LaTeX.)
- Login to this page with your PHYSNET account.
- Click on the EDIT button in the top right corner.
- Add your new entry as a single line respecting the documents format. You now see the document as a source code file. Have a look here to understand the syntax or just copy a previous line and adapt it.
The Simple Way (When you do not feel comfortable with programming or writing LaTeX.)
- Login to this page with your PHYSNET account.
- Write a comment in the comment section below (bottom of this page).
- Wait for someone else to transfer your comment into a proper entry.
Important Remarks
-
Since the actual LaTeX commands are hard to guess, they may be transcribed, abbreviated or imagined.
-
The following scheme is used:
-
description of the location of the issue: description of the issue -
Which you can write like in this example:
- [ ] on p. 123 in (45): missing `i` in `\exp`
which would look like this:
-
on p. 123 in (45): missing i
in\exp
-
Lucas may tick boxes to indicate a processed issue. Other contibuters please do not tick or untick boxes.
In case of further questions write a comment mentioning @jkwasnio. Responses may take up to a few days.
List of contributors
- Peter
- Margarit
- Jens
List of (Suspected) Errata, Formatting Issues & Suggestions for the PMI script (2020/21)
General Remarks
-
It would be nice, if all equations were numbered, making referring to them easier. -
When referencing back to definitions from previous chapers it would be helpful to add a \eqref
to the corresponding equation (e.g. when\hat{\bar{H}}
is referenced in chapter 8.2`). This makes it also easier to understand when a symbol is to be understood in its most general or approximated version. (At the beginning of chapter 8.2.2 this is done nicely for the CI matrix.)
By Section
1 (downloaded 2.9.2020)
2 (downloaded 2.9.2020)
-
after (6): (??) looks like a corrupted \eqref
3 (downloaded 11.9.2020)
-
(46): missing \perp
symbol in delta-dyadic -
(58): formatting of velocity off (wrong order of _
and\vec
suspected) -
p.32 last equation last line: missing 2
before\vec{A}^2
4 (downloaded 15.9.2020)
-
mode expansion, before (79) & after (81) (pp 37+38) in normalization factor (occurs multiple times over the script): should be V
not\sqrt
-
after (80): 2x missing )
, missing index in momenta in commutator,\vec{\Pi}
used instead of\hat{\Pi}
-
(81): \vec{\Pi}
used instead of\hat{\Pi}
-
(81): missing \perp on delta dyadic, the vanishing grad of delta^\perp was already shown in sec. 1
5 (downloaded 17.9.2020)
-
after 5.1 heading: 2x missing )
-
(87): order of operators wrong on the right side of the second equation -
after (87) in matrix element of exp(i \phi)
and also later: first Kronecker delta should be\delta_{n,0}
(not with anm
) and even better\delta{m, n-1}
for the entire matrix element (much simpler and easier to the the hermitian property ofcos/sin(\phi)
later on) -
matrix element of sin(\phi)
(occurs multiple times over the script): missing factor1/i
5.2 (downloaded 17.9.2020)
-
in [n, exp(i\phi)]
: one\hat{a}
too many in the middle & missing minus (-
) sign in the last expression -
(89) and also before that: missing n
in\ket
-
(89): missing i
in 2nd exponent -
(90) 2nd line: there should not be a + \hat{a}^\dagger
5.3 (downloaded 19.9.2020)
-
after (98) in <\alpha|\beta>
:|\beta|^2
should be in the numerator (not denominator) -
after (99) 2nd line in completeness relation proof: wrong order of \bra
<->\ket
5.4 (downloaded 19.9.2020)
-
(100): remove the 1/2
in front oft
factor in exponential inside the sum -
after (100) 2nd line: remove one )
-
after (100) 3rd line: \sum
should be overm
-
after (101) on page 55 2nd line: missing i
in expansion of\cos
-
after (101) on page 55 5th line: missing i
in exp (which becomes\cos
) -
after (101) on page 55 5th line: missing \infinity
above sum -
(102): redundant \eq
(=) sign
6 (downloaded 19.9.2020)
-
(105): missing \alpha
in front of sum
7 (downloaded 22.9.2020)
-
way after (106) on p. 66 after definition of order of 1st coherence function, the trivial clause: there should not be primed coordinates i.e. g^{(1)}(x,t,x,t)
. -
after definition of second-order field correlation function: should be G^{(2)}(x_1,t_1,x_2,t_2,x_1,t_1,x_2,t_2) \geq 0
(and not ...x_3,t_3,x_4,t_4
) -
p. 68 example (a) 2nd line: |n
should be inside ket -
p. 68 example (b) 2nd line: square should be in the denominator (not numerator)
8/8.1.1 (downloaded 25.9.2020)
-
first equation inside \sum\limits_n
: index of\vec{q}
should be\mu
and notn
-
(107): missing time derivative -
(108) on the left: missing i
-
(108) in the first denominator: missing |
on the right -
(108): change dagger to stars -
(109): missing Laplace operator -
after (109) on p.71 2nd equation left side right term in sum: missing \delta
in numerator and denominator -
after (109) on p.71 last equation first line left side: derivation should be with respect to \conjugate\{psi}_\sigma (t)
(not its time derivative) -
after (109) on p.71 last equation first line right side: missing integration variable should be x
-
after (109) p.71 last equation line 3 in front of double intergal: missing prefactor \frac{1}{2}
-
after (109) p.71 last equation multiple lines: change dagger to star -
after (109) p.72 2nd equation last line: missing \prime
and(
for second\conjugate{\psi}
-
(this one is optional) last line in text on p.72: missing space after closing )
-
p.73 first set of equations 3rd line right side of anti-commutator: change \Psi
into\Pi
-
p.73 before (110) in the text: \dagger
not in exponent -
(110) 2nd line: missing (x)
for first\psi
-
p.73 after (110) and anti-commutator relations: first sentence is not finished (may be ... hold for any particle number). -
p.73 last line in paragraph where One-Body operators is written: change nof to is of (?) -
p.73 second to last equation right side: shouldn't the \hat
be on\vec{x}
rather than thet
? -
p.74 second paragraph: the the -
p.74 2nd equation first line: missing \dagger
-
p.74 4th equation right side: missing \hat
s
8.1.2 (downloaded 25.9.2020)
-
p.75 last equation: \phi_p
should be\psi_p
-
(suggestion) p.75 last equation: small \omega
can be confusing as a abbreviation for the angle coordinates since it looks like it is related to an oscillation. A capitalized\Omega
might be less ambiguous here - or just use(\theta, \phi)
. -
p.76 2nd equation: remove (r)
-
p.76 2nd paragraph: typo meaningfuel -
p.76 paragraph before the 3rd equation: change \psi_p
to\phi_p
-
p.76 3d equation: q
should be in index of Kronecker delta -
p.76 2nd to last set of equations both lines on the left: remove prime
-
p.76 last equation missing parameter (\vec{x})
for orbit -
(suggestion) p.76 last equation: It would be nice if an explanation is given why why the orbit function is written only here in front of an annihilation operator. Maybe the commutating properties of \phi_p(x)
and\hat{\Psi}(x)
could be discussed here? -
(suggestion) p.76 end of page: It would be nice if the identity \sum\limits_p \conjugate{\phi_p}(\vec{x}^\prime) \phi_p(\vec{x}) = \delta(\vec{x}^\prime - \vec{x})
resulting from the orthonorality could be included here. Without this identity is seems impossible to show that the last two blocks of equations are consistent. -
p.77 1st equation 3rd row: missing (
and)
around\vec{x}^\prime
-
p.77 3rd equation middle term: missing \hat
ont
-
p.77 5rd equation 1st row: \vec{\nabla}
should be squared -
p.77 4rd equation: alignment for 2nd row is off -
p.77 4rd equation last line: missing integration variable \vec{x}
-
p.77 4rd equation last line: change summation index o
top
-
p.77 5th equation 2nd row: missing index s
in anihilation operator -
p.78 1st equation 1st line: missing \laplace
operator -
p.78 1st equation 1st line: missing \ket{\phi_q}
-
p.78 1st equation: The \phi_p
are not eigenvectors of this hamiltionian, hence there should be either\hat{\bar{V}}
in the hamiltonian or the diagonal elements do not vanish. To see this, go back to p. 75 1st equation.
8.1.3 (downloaded 25.9.2020)
-
p.79 listed item 2. middle of the line: missing \Rightarrow
-
p.79 item 3. 3rd line: missing \hat{c}^\dagger_p
on the right side -
p.79 item 5. 1st sentence: typo of of -
p.80 item 8. 2nd line: missing \hat{c}_p
-
p.80 item 8. 3rd line lower branch of curly braces: inconsistency in space placement, put space after ,
8.2 (dowloaded 2.12.20)
-
p.82 first equation ket on the right: sould be a \ket{ \{n_p\} }
(not\psi
) -
p.82 last paragraph: typo for a one-body operators -
(suggestion) p.83 1st paragraph: In general, use the notation \vec{n}
and\vec{n^\prime}
instead of\{n_p\}
and\{n_q\}
to denote occupation numbers. This will avoid confusion in expressions liken_r = 1
. Alternatively, more specific and use expressions liken_{p,r} = 1
instead. -
(suggestion) p.83 1st paragraph last sentence: mention indices of orbitals s
andr
explicitly. -
(suggestion) p.84 last equation 1st line: maybe explain the meaning of \epsilon_i
here (it was not obvious that it is from\hat{\bar{H}}
which includes the+ \hat{\bar{V}}
and thus the+ \sum_i\bar{V}_{ii}
arises later).
8.3 (downloaded 2.12.2020)
-
p.86 1st equation 3rd line: \hat{V_{e-e}}
instead of\hat{V_{l-l}}
-
p.88 1st paragraph: typo ... entire set of quantum nunbers \epsilon
should be\xi
-
p.88 1st paragraph: typo ... angular momentum nunbers l
,m
should bel
,m_l
-
(suggestion) p.88: recap also the definition of the orbital functions specifically, how the radial functions are related to the entire orbital function incl. the normalizations? The missing factor 4 \pi
in integral before (115) supprised me. How is the entire orbital function construced. How is\Omega
defined. All this should be clear but notations change and it helps to identifiy them. -
p.88 send equation: missing complex conjugation of one of the spherical harmonics Y
-
(suggestion) p.88 (115): Explain the meaning of l_2
here. -
p.88 second to last equation: missing \sum
overl_2
andm_2
? -
p.89 first equation: where do the \frac{1}{r}
come from? typo? -
p.89 last equation: L_s
should bel_s
-
p.89 after (115) 3r equation: 2x missing )
-
p.89 after (115) 3rd eqaution: convention of Clebsch-Gordon coefficient notation broken (either insert remove the ,
always) -> remove 4x,
in betweenm
s -
(suggestion): write Clebsch-Gordon coefficients always with ,
even when it's not conventional to prevent mixed notation -
p.89 last equation 2nd line: replace 4x \epsilon
with\xi
-
p.90 last paragraph: typo for i
should be fori \neq j
-
p.91 just before the huge equation: missing ,
in variational derivative between the\phi
s -
p.91 the huge equation 2nd line: missing double integral -
p.91 the huge equation 2nd + 3rd line: missing 2x (\vec{x}_1)
-
p.91 the huge equation 2nd + 3rd line: missing 2x index not in subscript \vec{x}_2
(should not be a square) -
p.91 the huge equation 5th line: missing )
-
p.91 the huge equation 5th line in the subscript of the \phi
right after thed^3x^\prime
: missing,
betweenj
and\sigma
-
p.91 the huge equation 7th line: use \Leftrightarrow
for equivalences for consistency with implication written as\Rightarrow
some lines above -
p.91 the huge equation last line after the last \phi
: missaligned)
-
p.92 (116): missing arguments for spatial 1-RDM function -
p.92 (116): change angle bracket to )
after second\psi
-
p.94 first equation 1st line after d^3x
: remove\star
-
p.94 second equation: operator \hat F
notf
(since it is denoted like that after this page) -
p.94 second equation: operator \hat J
notj
(hats for consistency) -
p.94 second equation: operator \hat K
notK
(hats for consistency) -
p.94 after second equation: operator \hat J
notJ
-
p.94 after third equation: operator \hat K
notk
-
p.94 fourth equation: operator \hat K
notk
-
p.94 5th equation: 2x operator \hat J
notJ
-
p.94 6th equation: 2x operator \hat K
notk
-
p.94 before last equation: operator \hat F
notf
-
p.94 last equation: operator \hat F
notf
-
p.99 last eqautin 2nd to last line: missing )
8.7
-
p.106 top: typo Hatree-Salter -
p.106 end of this section: unfinished sentence
8.8
-
p.106 last equation: \hat{f}
should be\hat{F}
(inconsistency see introduction of Fock operator) -
p.107 2nd paragraph: 2x k_f
should bek_F
(inconsistency see e.g. pp. 108) -
p.107 2nd paragraph: \epsilon_f
should be\epsilon_F
(inconsistency) -
p.107 2nd equation: 2x k_f
should bek_F
(inconsistency) -
p.107 2nd paragraph after \vec{k}^{\prime\prime}
:\sigma^{\prime\prime}
not\sigma
-
p.107 2nd equation 2nd line: remove the 2
-
p.107 4th equation 1st line: missing i
in exponential -
p.108 2nd equation: missing \vec{k}
-
p.109 top, substituion: x=k_f/k
should bex=k^{\prime\prime}/k
-
p.109 1st equation 5th line 2nd term: should be \ln(x-1)
(not\ln(1-x)
) -
p.109 2nd equation end of 2nd line: missing term +\frac{1}{2} \frac{k_F}{k} (\frac{k_f}{k}+1)
-
p.109 last equation 1st line: missing +1
after(\frac{k_f}{k}) +1
-
p.110 1st equation 7th line: missing 1
beore\ln(1-x)
-
p.110 1st equation 7th line: (
should be big -
p.110 1st equation 7th line: missing )
-
p.110 1st equation end of 5th line: missing term related to one of the integrals (from \int x \ln(1-x)
)
9.1
-
p.114 last equation 2nd line: missing \dagger
-
p.115 last equation last line: missing prefactor of 2
(?) -
p.115 last equation last line: missing i
in\exp
9.2
-
(suggestion) p. 118 (129: It would be nice, if the notation style is consistent with the previous chapters, i.e. if the sub-- and superscripts N_{el}
and0
were place inside the ket. -
p.119 after (130): missing restriction in higher order integral t^prime \leq t
-
(suggestion) p.119 end: Mention that up to 1st order this result for the transition rate is also known as Fermi's golden rule. This makes it easier to find secondary literature. -
p.119 2nd equation 2nd line: m
should beM
-
(suggestion) p.119 2nd equation: The justification for dropped terms with \epsilon
is not obvious and is therefore confusing - it also violates the strict meaning of the equals sign. It would be good to give an explanation here.
9.3
-
p.120 1st equation: l
not in index, should beN__{el}
-
p.120 2nd equation 1st line: remove -
in front ofN_{el}}
-
(suggestion)p.121 dipole approx: Maybe be more explicit about the approximation, i.e. mention that \abs{\vec{k}_{in} \vec{x}} \ll 1
and therefore the wavelength of the photon must be large. -
p.120 dipole approx.: The connection from hat{\vec{p}}}
to\hat{\vec{r}}
as the perturbation operator is missing. See e.g. here. Note: This is a simple yet important derivation and it was crucial when we found a mistake in the numerical exercises. -
p.120: typo singl-mode -
p.120 2nd equation 1st line: remove minus in front of N_{el}
in\bra{\Psi_F^{-N_{el}}}
-
p.121 2nd paragraph: typo ev instead of eV
9.4
-
p.122 1st equation: missing index in
for\vec{k}
in the\exp(i k x)
-term -
p.122 1st paragraph: typo on-photon -
p.123 before the exercise: typo integrating of better: over -
p.126 1st equation 2nd to last line: missing \tilde
onq
inE_q^{3/2}
in numerator -
(suggestion) p.125-126: The notation for the free electron momentum q
is inconsistent and confusing: The angular wheightd \Omega_{\vec{q}}
for example has no\tilde
but the final momentum\tilde{\vec{q}}
does. It seems simpler to drop the index ind \Omega
and give the momentumq
while it is in the kernel pf the integral a\prime
or something similar.
10.1
-
p.136 1st equation: \gamma
should be\theta
-
p.137 2nd equation: \exp (i \vec{x}\vec{x})
should be\exp (i \vec{k} \vec{x}
-
p.137 1st, 5th, 6th eauqtion: inconsistency of the symbol for the principal quantum number, previously \xi
now\epsilon
, (this migth appear multiple times thoughout the script)
11.1
-
p.139 2nd equation: nontaion of final state in incinsistent F
andf
-
p.148 in paragraph after last equation: N
should ben
in\bra{\Psi_N^{N_{el}-1}}
-
p.151 caption of figure 16 and 17: typo Satnra -
p.151 aption of figure 17: typo Koopman'stheorem
12
-
p.152 after 1st equation: \Lambda_{in}
should be\lambda_{in}
-
p.152 last equation last line: missing \sum \limits_{p,q}
-
p.153 3rd equation: missing i
in\exp
-
p.156 last block of eqautions 1st line: missing ^3 shortly after
\Rightarrow` -
p.156 1st equation last line: 1_s
sould b3e
1s`
13
-
p.165 last equation: ,L_{2,3}
should be in index -
p.156 after figure 19: typo that mediated
14
-
p.169 first paragraph: equation reference still incomplete
15
-
p.177 1st equation line 3 first bra: missing -1
-
p.178 1st equation last line in denominator: i \epsilon
should not be in superscript -
p.177 1st equation last line in first ket: turn index p
intoq
-
p.177 1st equation last line in last ket: turn index q
intoq^\prime
15.1
-
p.180 1st equation last polarization vector: missplaced conjugation symbol
15.2
-
p.186: typo a t -
p.186 2nd equation 2nd line: missing summation index -
p.188 last equation 4th line: sign in front of \omega_{in}
should be negative -
p.188 last equation last line: missing ^3
in big O -
p.190 typo: differenctial
16
-
p.193 eq. 156: inconsistency: photon state should be on the left -
p.193 eq. 156: typo remove ;
and,
-
p.195 middle of page: typo \Omega_F
should be\omega_F
-
p.196 2nd equation 2nd line: rightmost fraction should be polarization sum -
p.196 3rd equation 1st line: =
should be\approx
-
p.196 3rd equation 2nd line rightmost term: misplaced \tilde
on\omega_F
-
p.196 4th equation: missing \sum
-
p.197 typo: missing \
in front of sigma_{0,F}